Inside Intelligence: About School Finance...
For this week's nonscientific survey of insiders in politics and government, we asked about the recent school finance ruling, and whether it will be upheld, whether it will result in tax increases, and who — if anyone — will get the blame for the consequences.
Judge John Dietz’s ruling in the latest school finance trial — that the state’s method of funding public education is inequitable, inadequate and requires an illegal statewide property tax — prompted us to ask the insiders about their first impressions. The judge’s written ruling won’t be published for weeks, he said, and the appellate courts will have plenty of time to work after that.
We started there, asking whether the state’s highest civil court is likely to uphold the trial judge’s ruling: 60 percent said they will, though a number said in their comments — found abridged below and in full in the attachment — that the court will uphold some but not all of the ruling.
A majority of the insiders think the ruling will force a tax increase at the state level. Slightly less than half think it will result in higher local school property taxes.
Finally, we asked who — if anyone — is likely to be blamed by voters for the consequences of the ruling. One in eight insiders said nobody will; 44 percent said it will fall on Republicans and 16 percent said blame will fall on incumbents.
Will the Texas Supreme Court uphold a district judge’s school finance ruling?
• "Really need the text of that ruling before this question can be answered with any degree of certainty...and even then, is anything certain with this court?"
• "The Supreme Court would have to overturn its previous ruling to reject Dietz's finding on inequity."
• "The Leg blames the Supremes again, politically useful in that it provides political cover for any action on the tax front …sound familiar, same song, next verse."
• "There may be parts they de-empathize to provide the state with a softer decision, but the system too warped to say it meets constitutional standards in all respects."
• "Ridiculous, irresponsible, unfounded opinion by a biased liberal judge. It will almost entirely be overturned."
• "The Supremes will uphold the ruling - late this year or sometime next year. So why are school districts celebrating now? It's like winning the Publisher's Clearinghouse, but being told it may be up to two years before you get your money."
• "The one aspect that the state will have a particularly hard time defending is that of inequity. The rather unjustifiable differences in the amounts that school districts receive in the system are likely to bring this thing down. There's no explaining it away."
• "Our activist SC writes more laws than the legislature. They will write this one, but will punt the final funding and solution to the legislature and call it conservative."
• "The judge dusted off his prior ruling, changed the dates and dollars, and reordered it as expected. The high court struck down much of his previous ruling so we will see."
• "Liberal Democrat trial judge + conservative Appeals Court/conservative Supreme Court = changing standard of what constitutes a equitable and efficient public education."
• "I am afraid the court has become too much of a creature of the Executive branch."
• "Some of it? Yes. All of it? No."
If upheld, would the school finance ruling force a tax increase of some kind?
• "We don't need no stinkin' taxes! We don't need no education! We don't need no thought control!"
• "It might in certain school districts, but it could actually lower local school taxes if districts get to keep all the money they raise."
• "If not a tax, some other method to raise revenue will definitely be on the table. Who knows, even gambling might be on the table."
• "The money the state cut from the budget in 2011, if returned, plus savings by eliminating the Target Revenue and other Hold-Harmlesses provides enough money for a strong first step. Phasing in other required improvements will run concurrent with the improving economy."
• "If the court finds against the state solely on inequity, the solution can be to take the rich down to where everyone else is. That doesn't cost the state anything, financially speaking."
• "If it means shutting down public schools, this Legislature will not raise taxes."
• "It would force the state to utilize the resources it has to FULLY FUND public education in this state! It would require districts to use money for the purpose which it was intended - the EDUCATE students! Reduce the size of the 'district office' staffs and put teachers in classrooms."
• "At the minimum, this undermines posturing for a tax cut"
• "If it's $10 billion underfunding, absolutely. But it won't be. Look for gaming to come back into the picture."
• "In moral terms, of course. In political terms, keep dreaming."
If upheld, would the school finance ruling force an increase in local property taxes?
• "Probably not, assuming that the leadership protects the property tax relief fund."
• "Maybe not 'force,' but possibly result in one."
• "Wasn't this (hasn't this) been the basis for the flawed funding to begin with?"
• "Always does (eventually). And when too many districts are forced to go that route, that's the cue to file the next lawsuit against the state."
• "The 3 most likely sources for new state revenue seem to be 1) raising sales tax rate, 2) raising franchise tax rate, or 3) raising property tax rate. Good luck choosing the one that can pass."
• "Why would taxpayers approve a local tax increase only to have the revenue diverted to another school district?"
• "It should force a more statewide approach. Local tax disparities got us here."
• "Local property taxes will not be FORCED to go up, but local school will go up on them anyway and then blame the legislature. Its tradition for them to do so."
• "Since a quarter of the districts are already maxed out on their tax rate, it's hard to avoid a ruling that this is (once again) a state property tax. Since the state still hasn't been able to make up for the revenue lost to the 2006 forced school property tax cut, the only option will be to let the districts (with voter approval) raise their local rates even higher. Or give up on getting kids to pass tests."
Who, if anyone, will voters most blame for the consequences of the ruling?
• "Everyone will point fingers at each other."
• "You did not list my preferred answer. To quote the great Jo Carol Pierce, I blame God."
• "I actually think people could end up happy about this in the long run and will blame no one!"
• "The way things are set up, all sides can point somewhere else to assess blame."
• "Democrat voters will blame republican officials. Republican voters will blame judges."
• "You should have as a choice: 'Everybody named above, plus everyone not named, but not me.'"
Our thanks to this week's participants: Gene Acuna, Cathie Adams, Brandon Aghamalian, Jenny Aghamalian, Victor Alcorta, Clyde Alexander, George Allen, David Anthony, Jay Arnold, Louis Bacarisse, Charles Bailey, Walt Baum, Dave Beckwith, Rebecca Bernhardt, Andrew Biar, Allen Blakemore, Tom Blanton, Hugh Brady, Chris Britton, Lydia Camarillo, Kerry Cammack, Thure Cannon, Snapper Carr, Janis Carter, William Chapman, Elizabeth Christian, Rick Cofer, John Colyandro, Harold Cook, Beth Cubriel, Randy Cubriel, Curtis Culwell, Denise Davis, Hector De Leon, June Deadrick, Nora Del Bosque, Tom Duffy, Jeff Eller, Jack Erskine, Jon Fisher, Neftali Garcia, Norman Garza, Dominic Giarratani, Bruce Gibson, Eric Glenn, Kinnan Golemon, Daniel Gonzalez, John Greytok, Clint Hackney, Wayne Hamilton, Bill Hammond, Adam Haynes, Ken Hodges, Steve Holzheauser, Shanna Igo, Deborah Ingersoll, Richie Jackson, Cal Jillson, Jason Johnson, Bill Jones, Mark Jones, Robert Jones, Lisa Kaufman, Richard Khouri, Tom Kleinworth, Ramey Ko, Sandy Kress, Pete Laney, Dick Lavine, James LeBas, Donald Lee, Luke Legate, Leslie Lemon, Richard Levy, Ruben Longoria, Homero Lucero, Vilma Luna, Matt Mackowiak, Bryan Mayes, Dan McClung, Scott McCown, Mike McKinney, Debra Medina, Robert Miller, Mike Moses, Steve Murdock, Craig Murphy, Keats Norfleet, Pat Nugent, Keith Oakley, Gardner Pate, Jerry Philips, Wayne Pierce, Richard Pineda, Allen Place, Royce Poinsett, Kraege Polan, Gary Polland, Jay Propes, Bill Ratliff, Patrick Reinhart, Jason Sabo, Andy Sansom, Jim Sartwelle, Stan Schlueter, Bruce Scott, Robert Scott, Ben Sebree, Christopher Shields, Julie Shields, Ed Small, Todd Smith, Larry Soward, Dennis Speight, Jason Stanford, Keith Strama, Bob Strauser, Colin Strother, Michael Quinn Sullivan, Sherry Sylvester, Jay Thompson, Russ Tidwell, Gerard Torres, Trey Trainor, Vicki Truitt, Ware Wendell, Ken Whalen, Darren Whitehurst, Seth Winick, Peck Young, Angelo Zottarelli.
Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.
ReferenceInside Intelligence: Verbatim Responses for 2/11/13
Information about the authors
Quality journalism doesn't come free
Perhaps it goes without saying — but producing quality journalism isn't cheap. At a time when newsroom resources and revenue across the country are declining, The Texas Tribune remains committed to sustaining our mission: creating a more engaged and informed Texas with every story we cover, every event we convene and every newsletter we send. As a nonprofit newsroom, we rely on members to help keep our stories free and our events open to the public. Do you value our journalism? Show us with your support.Yes, I'll donate today