State Government

Scotch the notion, which was being knocked around in the mostly idle Pink Building last week, that a delay in redistricting would automatically keep the current maps in place for a few more years. Those maps are generally considered to be favorable to Democrats. A judge could leave those plans in place, but the changes in the state’s population have been so extensive that it would be a tough decision to defend. The current plans are probably burnt toast after this next set of elections.

A new law requires candidates to file their campaign finance reports “by computer disk, modem, or other means of electronic transfer.” A little twist in the law requires the Texas Ethics Commission to post the reports on the Internet for all of Texas to see, but to first strip out street addresses of contributors, ostensibly for reasons of privacy and piracy. The law also says people can get the reports by showing up at the ethics agency and requesting them.

The national press, in particular the political press corps from the city of Washington, D.C., thinks the Texas press has left a lot of food on the table when it comes to Gov. George W. Bush. There’s been talk, as the saying goes, the gist of which is that the local folks have been very easy on the state’s chief executive and that it will take the heat of a national race to cook out the truth.

We liked it better when stories about baby boomers were about hip-huggers and greasy hair and loud music, but the most self-centered generation in modern America is getting old. That ain’t news in and of itself, but it presents a whole slew of things for people in government and business to think about and Texas actually has dispatched a team to start doing some of that thinking.

No one has stepped forward to announce a challenge to Sen. James “Buster” Brown, R-Lake Jackson, but the senator’s local GOP has put together most of the tools an opponent would need.

Only two months into the current budget, the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse (TCADA for short) has discovered it has $57 million less than it thought, partly because the agency has less money on hand than it forecast and partly because it’s spending money faster than it knew.

The little ol’ Texas budget is suddenly national news, and with the misinformation sure to float up in the backwash of political advertising, it’s probably a good idea to pull the numbers together to see when various finger-pointers are telling the truth and when they’re fibbing.

Since last Texas Independence Day, when Gov. George W. Bush publicly confessed for the first time that he’d like to dive into this presidential hoopla, Texas politics has been about “Ifs.”

Handicapping the Senate race in San Antonio? Trying to figure out where everyone will be sitting when the music stops? You can tell what at least some of the political folks in that city are thinking, just by the fact that only one House seat — the one now occupied by Rep. Leticia Van de Putte — has drawn really active interest from candidates who want her job. So far, the seat that would be left open if Rep. Leo Alvarado Jr. wins the special election to replace Sen. Gregory Luna has drawn some tire-kickers but no sure-fire buyers, while the candidates looking at the Van de Putte seat are already working the district and the local lobby and the finance people and the Austin crowd.

If you don’t live in San Antonio or Houston or a handful of other places that have sports arenas and Senate races and other interesting issues before the voters, the November ballot offers up a treat only a civics proctor could love: 17 constitutional amendments that, for the most part, don’t even offer the thrill of controversy or everyday relevance.