Federal judge says Trump administration must allow new DACA applications
U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ruled Tuesday that the administration's decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was never fully explained and could not be justified. However, Bates did allow for a 90-day hold on his ruling “to afford [the Department of Homeland Security] an opportunity to better explain its view that DACA is unlawful.”
A Tuesday ruling by a federal judge may mean a setback for the Trump administration's efforts to phase out an Obama-era immigration program that shielded young undocumented immigrants from deportation.
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge John D. Bates of the District of Columbia said the administration's decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program was never fully explained and could not be justified. However, Bates did allow for a 90-day hold on his ruling “to afford [the Department of Homeland Security] an opportunity to better explain its view that DACA is unlawful.”
“The Department’s decision to rescind DACA was predicated primarily on its legal judgment that the program was unlawful,” Bates wrote. “That legal judgment was virtually unexplained, however, and so it cannot support the agency’s decision.”
Previous legal challenges from California and New York have forced the federal government to continue to accept renewals, but Tuesday's decision — if it goes through — would go one step further, requiring that new applications must also be accepted. The latest development was first reported by The Washington Post.
President Donald Trump announced in September that his administration would end the program — which has benefited more than 800,000 recipients, including more than 120,000 Texans, since its inception in 2012, according to government statistics — saying it would be phased out over six months to give lawmakers time to come up with a legislative fix.
That six-month deadline came and went in March with the program still tied up in court.
The question of how to keep the program afloat with legislation has perplexed lawmakers in Washington, who have been unable to come up with a solution that is palatable to both parties. In February, the U.S. Senate rejected four separate proposals that would have codified the protections included in DACA while bolstering border security.
Although renewals are still accepted, immigrant rights groups have cautioned that applicants who have pending renewals run the risk of getting caught in what they’ve called the administration’s ramped-up deportation machine.
“For tens of thousands of DACA recipients whose status expires in the coming months, given the time lag between renewal application and a decision by [U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services], it is likely that many will lose their work authorization, get fired from their jobs and be at risk for deportation, at least for a period of time,” Ali Noorani, the executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said last month.
There could also be future litigation on the horizon. In January, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton wrote in an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court that Texas and 12 other states would consider a legal challenge to the 2012 memo that created DACA if the program still existed in June.
That came after Texas and a coalition of other states successfully sued the federal government to prevent a separate Obama-era immigration program, 2014's Deferred Action for Parents of Americans, or DAPA, from being implemented. That initiative sought to expand by millions the number of undocumented immigrants who would be shielded from deportation and allowed to legally work in the United States.
Quality journalism doesn't come free
Perhaps it goes without saying — but producing quality journalism isn't cheap. At a time when newsroom resources and revenue across the country are declining, The Texas Tribune remains committed to sustaining our mission: creating a more engaged and informed Texas with every story we cover, every event we convene and every newsletter we send. As a nonprofit newsroom, we rely on members to help keep our stories free and our events open to the public. Do you value our journalism? Show us with your support.Yes, I'll donate today