James Shaffer used to be guilty of looking down at his phone while driving.
He thinks about that now, just months after a distracted driver unlocked her phone and swerved into oncoming traffic, killing his wife and 12-year-old daughter.
"It's just that you become more aware of it when it hits home," Shaffer said.
Now, he can't help but notice dozens of distracted drivers on the road. Since the wreck in April, he's spent his energy calling on public officials to pass laws that ban texting while driving. He's started small – testifying at local city council meetings in Denton. But he hopes lawmakers heading back to the Capitol in January will finally pass a statewide ban on texting while driving.
"I think the state of Texas needs to take a hard look at this ... and a strict stance on this," Shaffer said. "It's not going away. It's getting worse."
Drivers know the risks, and in more than 95 Texas counties they live under local cell phone ordinances that ban texting while driving. But the Lone Star State remains one of four states in the country without a statewide ban on the practice.
Sen. Judith Zaffirini, D-Laredo, hopes to change that with Senate Bill 31, which would make it illegal to text unless the vehicle is stopped. Lawmakers have shot down similar attempts by Zaffirini for four sessions in a row, but she hopes the fifth time's a charm as lawmakers head back to Austin in January.
"All we can do is try," she said. "It's so important because more and more Texans have become aware about the danger that’s posed by texting while driving."
Zaffirini's legislation mirrors efforts by Rep. Tom Craddick, the Republican former House speaker from Midland, who filed anti-texting legislation in the last three legislative sessions. He filed his fourth attempt on the first day of bill filing last week. Once again, Zaffirini and Craddick are naming their legislation after Alex Brown, a West Texas high school student who was killed in a crash while texting and driving in 2009.
It will be an uphill climb, however. The legislation was approved by the House in 2015 and 2013 but halted by the Senate. Zaffirini was just one senator short of passing the bill through the Senate in 2015. It passed both chambers in 2011, but was vetoed by then-Gov. Rick Perry.
But that veto was unusual, Craddick said, because Perry was in the midst of his first presidential bid. Perry called the anti-texting bill “a government effort to micromanage the behavior of adults.”
Craddick is hopeful it won’t be vetoed by Gov. Greg Abbott if it passes both chambers during the 85th Legislature. He said he's also heard positive remarks made by Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick in Midland.
“(Abbott) has been pretty positive to people that have talked to him about it. I feel like he’ll sign it,” Craddick said. “(Patrick) said he thought the Senate would pass it, too.”
That would be a shift from earlier remarks made by Abbott, who said he opposed the legislation in 2014 and would veto any texting while driving legislation that made it to his desk. After the legislation made it through the House in 2015, Abbott promised to give it the “deep consideration it deserves.”
A spokesman for Abbott did not say if the governor plans to approve the legislation if it lands on his desk in 2017, but that he would “consider any proposal passed through the Legislature with the goal of making Texas better.”
Critics of anti-texting legislation argue that it could lead to racial profiling or erode Texans' civil liberties. Sen. Konni Burton, R-Colleyville, led Senate opposition to the legislation last session, arguing the legislation did not “provide any additional protections to Texans and contains several enforceability issues.”
It’s likely Craddick will meet similar opposition in the Senate this time around, but he said he disagrees with criticism that it will take away Texan’s rights.
“I just don’t feel like that’s happening,” he said. “To drive in the state of Texas is not a right, really. It’s not something that we owe them. You still have to have a driver’s license, insurance and abide by the law so everyone feels safe.”
AT&T, which has been a big supporter of Craddick’s legislation, released a study that found that the four states without a statewide ban “have a roughly 17 percent higher rate of texting while driving than the 46 states with statewide bans.”
Texas A&M University’s Transportation Institute released similar studies on the state impact of texting while driving. College Station, where the university is located, recently passed its own ordinance that banned the use of a wireless device while driving.
Alva Ferdinand, a faculty member at Texas A&M’s school of public health, led a 2015 study that found a 7 percent reduction in crash-related hospitalization in states that have enacted texting while driving bans. An earlier study by Ferdinand found that texting bans led to a 3 percent reduction in traffic fatalities among all age groups.
Shaffer, who is all too familiar with those statistics following the death of his wife and daughter, called on lawmakers to pass the legislation. His daughter's cheerleading team even created a petition, which has more than 33,500 signatures and will be sent to the state senate, house and the governor's office.
"I absolutely hope it passes this time," Shaffer said. "If not, they're going to get an earful from me."
Read the Tribune's related coverage:
- Here’s an early look at the bills expected to draw attention when lawmakers reconvene in Austin in 2017.
- With the death of a bill that would have created a statewide texting-while-driving ban, the measure’s author said Thursday that legislators “have not done our job as lawmakers to protect the life and safety of all Texans.”
- Doctors, law enforcement officers, and family members of crash victims gathered at the Capitol to testify in support of a statewide texting-while-driving ban. Forty-four states now ban text messaging while driving.
Disclosure: AT&T and Texas A&M University have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune. A complete list of Tribune donors and sponsors can be viewed here.