Legislation aimed at salary discrimination sparked a gender fight in the Texas House on Thursday.
House Bill 950, by state Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, would synchronize state law with the protections of the federal Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. A 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision clarified that the 180-day statute of limitations for filing an equal-pay lawsuit regarding pay discrimination resets with each new paycheck.
The debate was derailed when state Rep. Sarah Davis, R-West University Place, stepped up to the back mic to make an inquiry that started quiet eruptions from members across the chamber. "Do you think anyone voting against this bill will be voting against equality for men and women?” Davis asked Thompson.
State Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Frisco, was quick to decry that line of thinking. “I am voting ‘no’ on this bill because it will hurt business,” Fallon said, adding that he wasn't discriminating by opposing the bill. “All 150 members have equality. No other state has passed such a law. I have a mother, a sister and a wife. My vote is not against women.”
The measure ultimately passed 79-50.
“Since we have had a long-standing system of mirroring our law with federal statute,” Thompson said of the vote, “it seems a little off that we women have to still fight a little harder.”
Proponents of HB 950 argue that it would allow back pay awards to accrue longer, in accordance with federal statute; change Texas Labor Code to allow for claimants to resolve their cases in state courts, closer to home; and have workers and employers governed by uniform laws at state and federal levels.
“I was just a little surprised they didn’t grasp the real essence of the bill,” Thompson said.
Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.