A report adopted on Friday by the Texas Forensic Science Commission concludes that the potential reversal of thousands of drug convictions by the Court of Criminal Appeals was due to the incompetence of a Department of Public Safety crime lab employee. Members of the commission said itโs unclear whether every conviction connected to the employeeโs work has been scientifically compromised.ย
At a commission meeting on Friday, the members discussed whether their findings regarding a DPS crime lab worker who replaced the results of one test with another mean that all of the drug samples that passed through his hands are now compromised. They also found that interviews with colleagues supported the conclusion that the employee “struggled with corrections and an overall understanding of the chemistry, especially in difficult cases.”
The Court of Criminal Appeals has reversed more than 10 convictions due to the mistakes of the DPS Houston crime lab worker, Jonathan Salvador, who left the department last year. In the reversal of the conviction of Junius Sereal, from Galveston County, the judges wrote that all of the cases Salvador touched could be jeopardized.
โWhile there is evidence remaining that is available to retest in this case, that evidence was in the custody of the lab technician in question,โ according to the judicial opinion. โThis Court believes his actions are not reliable therefore custody was compromised, resulting in a due process violation.โ
โThis one analyst handled thousands of cases in the Houston area, and due to the breadth of the opinion, they may all be jeopardized,โ the Texas District and County Attorneys Association wrote in a letter to its members.
But Sarah Kerrigan, a member of the commission and the chairwoman of the forensic science department at Sam Houston State University, said โthere arenโt systematic issues weโre aware of with property control,โ and that in some of the cases, there may be other drug evidence left that was uncorrupted by Salvador.
Jeff Blackburn, a lawyer with the Innocence Project of Texas, told the commission that the court is applying the same opinion to all of the cases involving Salvador simply as a practical matter. The Court of Criminal Appeals, he said, cannot possibly look at every single case connected to Salvadorโs testing along with their normal work and so they are indicating that they will always rule in favor of the defendant in these cases. โI think itโs the numbers and judicial economy,โ he said.
Part of the problem, Blackburn added, is that Texas has no centralized public defender system, so each county handles the problematic convictions differently. โWe have to go piecemeal,โ he said, โbut weโre doing the best with what weโve got.โ
Salvador, who could not be reached for comment, was suspended from his duties as a forensic scientist with DPS in February 2012, when the department discovered the falsification of results in a controlled substance test. Salvador had worked onย 4,900 drug cases in 30 counties since he took the job in 2006, DPS spokesman Tom Vinger said, adding that a Harris County grand jury chose not to indict Salvador.
After the discovery, Vinger said, โthe department implemented more stringent quality control measures to help prevent similar issues in the future.โ
In its report, the commission found that other workers in the lab described Salvador as quick to correct his mistakes when they were pointed out. His work, they found, was โโright on the edge of acceptability,โ but his supervisors โmade good faith efforts to help Salvador improveโ because his โattitude was always so positive.โ
โSalvadorโs easygoing and collegial demeanor contributed to managementโs reluctance to more aggressively discipline or dismiss himโ before the incident where he replaced the results of one test with another, which the commission called โprofessional misconduct.โ
Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

