Winemiller: Water Allocation is a Zero-Sum Game
Kirk Winemiller, an ecologist in the Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Department at Texas A&M University, argues in an opinion piece that while the 2011 drought was not as severe as the drought of the 1950s, the path to recovery is different now.
Kirk Winemiller, an ecologist in the Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Department at Texas A&M University, argues in an opinion piece in the Austin American-Statesman that while the 2011 drought was not as dramatic in its effects as the “drought of record” during the 1950s, the path to recovery is different now. Water allocation, he says, is a zero-sum game, and what is getting lost in the debate over funding the state water plan is its costs, as opposed to the benefits. When more water is diverted for human use, he says, less water flows in rivers and into bays, thus affecting fish and wildlife. As the Legislature considers investing billions from the Rainy Day Fund for new water infrastructure, Winemiller argues that the most effective and cheapest ways to secure water during drought are better reuse technologies, efficiencies and conservation.
Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.
Quality journalism doesn't come free
Perhaps it goes without saying — but producing quality journalism isn't cheap. At a time when newsroom resources and revenue across the country are declining, The Texas Tribune remains committed to sustaining our mission: creating a more engaged and informed Texas with every story we cover, every event we convene and every newsletter we send. As a nonprofit newsroom, we rely on members to help keep our stories free and our events open to the public. Do you value our journalism? Show us with your support.Yes, I'll donate today