The Texas Supreme Court agreed Friday morning to review a state tax on small cigarette manufacturers, known collectively as “Small Tobacco.”

The case centers on House Bill 3536, passed two years ago, which imposes a 55-cent fee on each pack of cigarettes produced by Small Tobacco. State Rep. John Otto, who wrote the bill, said at the time his goal was to โ€œlevel the playing fieldโ€ โ€” tax smaller cigarette manufacturers in the same way Big Tobacco is taxed.

The nationโ€™s four largest tobacco companies currently pay more than half a billion dollars to the state each year as part of a 1998 lawsuit settlement, following a legal battle in which 46 states sued Big Tobacco for a range of fraudulent practices, such as secretly producing high-nicotine tobacco, and deceptive advertising techniques, often aimed at children. ย 

After Texas’ House Bill 3536 passed, Small Tobacco companies filed an appeal, saying their companies had not engaged in such practices โ€” and therefore should not be penalized. The law, they said, violated Texasโ€™ โ€œEqual and Uniform Clause,โ€ which holds that taxes must be uniform on all items similar to each other. In other words, the state canโ€™t levy a tax on cigarette manufacturers of a certain size without making a reasonable distinction between their cigarettes and the cigarettes of their Big Tobacco counterparts.

Last year, the 3rd Court of Appeals in Austin sided with Small Tobacco.

โ€œIn Texas, taxation must be equal and uniform,โ€ wrote Judge David Puryear. There is no evidence that cigarette tobacco โ€œdiffers even slightly when manufactured by Small Tobacco versus Big Tobacco.โ€

The state appealed the ruling, and will argue its case in front of the Texas Supreme Court on Dec. 8.

Texans need the truth. Help us report it.

Become a member. Join today.

Choose an amount or learn more about membership.

Jordan Rudner was a reporting fellow for The Texas Tribune in 2015-16. A Plan II and history major at the University of Texas at Austin, Jordan previously interned at KUT News and the Supreme Court of...