Skip to main content

Opinion: Education Spending Up for Debate in Colorado

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that the state Legislature did not intentionally violate a law requiring the state to annually increase money it allocates for per pupil spending and need-based money.

Republish
Lead image for this article
Credit: Graphic by Todd Wiseman

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that the state Legislature did not intentionally violate a law requiring the state to annually increase money it allocates for per pupil spending and need-based money. The new law mandated increased spending regardless of economy or budget limitations. However, a recent suit claimed that the Legislature has consistently violated the intent of the amendment. (The Colorado Statesman)

Wait! We need your help.

More than 2 million people read Texas Tribune articles every month, but only 12,000 of those readers also donate to support the news they count on. Not even 1% of readers! If you are one of the 99% of Texas Tribune readers who hasn’t made a donation before in support of independent Texas news, you can change that today. A small donation makes a big impact.

Our Spring Member Drive is an important time to help our newsroom plan for what resources will be available for them to tackle longer investigations and bigger projects later this year. Texas Tribune journalists need the support of readers to write the articles, take the photographs and create the data visualizations that impact Texans and Texas policy.

We have a goal to have 500 readers become Texas Tribune members during our Spring Member Drive. As the Tribune member community grows, the journalism you read here is better protected. Will you make a donation today to show your support of independent Texas news?

DONATE NOW

Information about the authors

Madlin Mekelburg’s staff photo

Learn about The Texas Tribune’s policies, including our partnership with The Trust Project to increase transparency in news.

Explore related story topics