Using U.S. Census American Community Survey data, this interactive shows which Texas counties have the lowest and highest rates of poverty, broken down by race.
Poverty levels are calculated by the U.S. Census based on a predetermined set of income thresholds that vary depending on the individual and/or family being surveyed. If a family's income is less than its assigned threshold, that family and everyone in it is considered to be impoverished. To learn more about how the Census Bureau calculates this measure, click here.
To use the interactive, select a race/ethnicity from the drop-down menu. Hover or tap on the map to learn more about the poverty breakdown of a particular county.
Want to play with the data yourself? Download it here.
The Texas Tribune is pleased to provide the opportunity for you to share your observations about this story. We encourage lively debate on the issues of the day, but we ask that you refrain from using profanity or other offensive speech, engaging in personal attacks or name-calling, posting advertising, or wandering away from the topic at hand. To comment, you must be a registered user of the Tribune, and your real name will be displayed. Thanks for taking time to offer your thoughts.
Comments (3)
Tommy Walker
There are errors in this database that are causing skewed results. For example:
Zapata County -- Population 4
Starr County -- Population 19
Dimmit County -- Population 2
et cetera
Tommy Walker
This is a great map that I will be sharing. Thank you for correcting the database behind it.
baltazar acevedo
I concur with Dormand Long's perspectives. The gaps in the social and economic infrastructures of communities must be ameliorated first before we go off expanding colleges and universities in south Texas. A recent report that was funded by the Houston Endowment provided data that reflected the tracking of 8th graders for over 883,000 Texas students starting 8th grade in 1996-98, the fraction getting any degree or certificate the Number was only 21.9%. Among Texas important African American and Latino populations, it was less than 13%. We have not held our educational institutions, both at the public and post-secondary levels accountable for giving the taxpayers a return of investment that is worthy of the billions of dollars that these institutions receive. When the dropout rates hover around 38% and college/university are graduating less than 15% of their students within four years along the Texas Border with Mexico, something has got to give.
Essentially, the universities are good at spinning the truth and never getting to the core of the data that demonstrate that they are not doing an outstanding job with our resources. I recent retired after 45 years in the Texas higher education system and I can tell you that higher education in Texas is over-sourced and that faculty and administrators are not paying sufficient attention to the outcomes: student success. I retired because I was frustrated by all of the public relations hyperbole that came out from the universities and with the callous attitudes that these institutions had for students. I am not even considering the issue of student debt here and how ill prepared students come out of high schools. Education and the sustainable development of families are the key to impeding the progress of poverty. Instead, the political gamesmanship continues both in Austin and in D.C.
Just once, I would like to hear a Chancellor or president state publicly, "we are doing a third rate job and I need to be fired." Instead we overpay them and faculty is hard to find on any Friday on any university campus in the state of Texas.
Baltazar Acevedo y Arispe, Jr., Ph.D.
Borderlands Consulting Group
Waco, Texas