Skip Navigation

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Lubbock Poll or Leave It? Leave It.
Well, as Ross Ramsey's post explains, we've heard from Michael Stevens, and I"m glad we did. Based on how he explained his method to Ramsey, the poll should be taken with not a grain, but a shaker of salt.  
This is not a sound sampling method, period.  
The sampling method is neither random nor matched, and there is likely significant non-response bias, a classic problem in mail-only solicitation. (In English: That means there might be something about the people that don't respond to your poll — some particular characteristic — that ...
Full Post
Comment Policy

The Texas Tribune is pleased to provide the opportunity for you to share your observations about this story. We encourage lively debate on the issues of the day, but we ask that you refrain from using profanity or other offensive speech, engaging in personal attacks or name-calling, posting advertising, or wandering away from the topic at hand. To comment, you must be a registered user of the Tribune, and your user name will be displayed. Thanks for taking time to offer your thoughts.

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Sign-Up

Comments (3)
  • I bow to Mr. Henson as the premier expert on inaccurate polling. His internet polls are a joke - completely disregarded and proven disreputable in the political community. Message to Texas Tribune: get your money back.

    The Lubbock poll results should be handled the same way internetpolls results are treated: lift lid, drop into bowl, pull handle down, FLUSH!

  • Thanks for checking out the poll. A thoughtful analysis of polling methods is valuable to those of us who take polling seriously. Silly, ad-hominem attacks on polls are better suited for the low road of the campaign trail and middle school playground.

  • send your e mail to info@action-printing.com for a report of our polling sample is created and how our web based software collects survey information. mike stevens