State Audit Exposes More Problems at Cancer Institute
A state audit has revealed that transparency problems at the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas extend beyond the improper review of an $11 million commercialization grant that sparked criminal and civil investigations.
State auditors found business and professional relationships between CPRIT’s management, CPRIT’s commercialization review council, and donors who contributed to the CPRIT Foundation, a nonprofit association that supplements the salaries of CPRIT’s executive director and chief scientific officer. They also found three grants that were approved without proper review — the executive director recommended the applications receive grants, but the peer review council did not ...

Comments (6)
Casey Magnuson via Texas Tribune on Facebook
Crazy.
Lance Lowry via Texas Tribune on Facebook
This is Sharpstown all over again. Keep watching this story... Lance Armstrong, Rick Perry, and David Dewhurt.
Pickles Sorrell
Get this crap before a Travis County Grand Jury. This has Jimmy Mansour's fingerprints all over it.
Kim Feil
What needs to be exposed is the proximity of new cancer cases of people that live or work downwind to drilling for oil and gas.
audrey fisher
Texas can't seem able to stop itself from throwing more money away. In a sad but true story, the Nobel Prize winner CEO resigned in part because of a $18M incubator grant to MD Anderson.
What happened next: The CPRIT board appointed a new CEO - Margaret Kripke - an emeritus of MD Anderson.
Nope, nothing to see here folks, please move on - Austin has decided that $3B of our taxpayer dollars must fund this agency - regardless of the lack of oversight or Peer Review.
There is pending legislation in both the House and Senate to end this free giveaway: HJR64 and SJR19. I'm not holding my breathe that Austin will act responsibly and admit they were wrong or care about wasting taxpayer dollars.
Jim Vance
The term "honeypot" wasn't used in the article (and likely not in the audit report, either), but it should have been.