Vol 28, Issue 44 Print Issue

In SBOE Races, Drama Already Running High

With three longtime (and moderate) members stepping down and all 15 members up for re-election because of changes brought about by redistricting, political control over the divisive State Board of Education hangs in the balance. And even though the filing period has yet to begin, there are already signs that these races could get ugly. 

Some board members will undoubtedly try to oust each other. David Bradley, R-Beaumont, who consistently votes with the board’s social conservatives, said he would be “actively working” against Thomas Ratliff, McLeroy's replacement. 

Randy Stevenson, a Tyler businessman who served on the board from 1994 to 1998, announced Wednesday that he would run against Ratliff, a registered lobbyist whose clients include Microsoft and whose opponents, because of that, have argued that he should be disqualified from office.

Ratliff said his lobby contracts avoid any conflict with board duties and that he is unconcerned about his profession becoming a liability in the upcoming election. “Despite their best efforts to make it an issue, it continues to fall on deaf ears,” he said.

Bradley has yet to attract a declared opponent, but that's expected to happen soon. Meanwhile, social conservative incumbents Ken Mercer and chairwoman Barbara Cargill have already drawn primary challengers, as has George ClaytonBob Craig and Marsha Farney, moderate Republicans, and Mary Helen Berlanga, a Democrat, have all announced that they will not seek re-election.

The race in Clayton’s district, which now includes all of Collin County north of Dallas, may prove especially contentious. Clayton, a teacher who lives in Richardson, defeated longtime incumbent Geraldine “Tincy” Miller in an upset during the 2010 primary. Miller now wants her old seat back and has launched a campaign attacking Clayton’s conservative credentials, in particular his support of a plan last spring that would have directed $2 billion from the Permanent School Fund to public schools. The board’s six social conservatives did not sign the letter and vigorously objected to drawing from the fund.

Miller said she was "incredulous" when she heard what some board members were proposing to do with the fund. Board members, she said, “should never, ever be a part of trying to go around that constitutional wording and raid that fund with a constitutional amendment.”

But perhaps more damaging to Clayton in a Republican primary are the rumors that prompted him to send an email to members of the media last week with the subject line "sexual orientation." Clayton, who was leaked the notes of a conversation between Miller and Tea Party Activist Susan Fletcher that mentioned his "living arrangements," confirmed in the email that he has "a male partner who lives with me in my home.”

In a phone interview, Miller said that she was not the one who brought up Clayton's sexual orientation, but she noted that others have. Fletcher said in an email that she was “urged by several sources in general” to investigate Clayton’s living arrangement — but not by Miller.

Clayton said in an email that when he realized his personal life might become an issue in the campaign, his first instinct was to “nip it in the bud.” That strategy has already cost him one supporter: Conservative blogger Donna Garner, who is a vocal follower of education issues, sent out an email Tuesday night retracting an endorsement of him.

Clayton said the political makeup of the board — and whether "cool heads and reasonable discussions" would prevail — depends on the next election. The board’s biggest responsibility in the next four years, he wrote, will be “to keep public education alive in Texas.”